What Dave said and a couple more: a) What testing did you do for this? Run make check? Test against gdb? Test against lldb? b) Speaking of adding standard-ese to some comments,, please make the comment on return types for functions reference the non-normative text in 3.3.2.
-eric On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 2:33 PM, Adrian Prantl <[email protected]> wrote: > According to section 5.2 of the DWARF4 standard, the void type > should be represented as an unspecified type with the name "void”. > (Before this we would emit an empty type and let the debugger guess the > name). > > Fix for rdar://problem/13291085 > > thanks, > Adrian >
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
