On Apr 8, 2013, at 11:06 AM, Eric Christopher <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 10:40 AM, John McCall <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Apr 5, 2013, at 5:22 PM, Adrian Prantl <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Patch for review, mostly for the IRBuilder::DisableDebugLocations() part. >>> >>> Do not attach a debug location to code inserted by ARC -- >>> it would create a spurious line table entry at the closing } of the scope. >> >> Is this a problem? Just that we don't want "next" to stop here? > > Pretty much. It's analogous to the same when we're looking at > cleanups, etc. I think this is going into the realm of "opinions on > behavior" here.
Is 'next' driven completely by line table information, or is there some way in DWARF to more explicitly say "this is a point that 'next' should stop at"? John. _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
