Er.. Ping?
Or would it be better if by default I submitted to llvm-reviews first? I
just followed the process as laid out in "Hacking Clang".
Thanks!
- ½
On 13-04-10 05:05 PM, Halfdan Ingvarsson wrote:
Hello
This is my first patch submission, although I've been using clang as
my primary work compiler for over a year.
It's a simple suppression on unused function warnings
(-Wunused-function) for specialized template functions, whose primary
template has a static storage class. E.g:
---- 8< ----
template<typename T> static inline bool
isNonZero(T a) { return (bool)a; }
template<> inline bool
isNonZero(const char *s) { return s; }
---- 8< ---
Currently the second definition will emit an unused warning.
The attached patch uses the storage class from the primary template
when checking whether to omit static inline functions from the unused
warnings (since specializations implicitly inherit this storage class).
- ½
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits