On 17.04.2013, at 00:06, João Matos wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 3:59 AM, [email protected]
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> However, I have another patch to provide support for "for each", also
> well-tested by our codebase. However, I think this feature is not useful, but
> if someone needs it I can post it here.
>
> Interesting, I also have some work-in-progress "for each" implementation, but
> I am doing it for C++/CLI. I'd like to see your patch, it's probably more
> complete than mine.
>
When you guys implement the for each loop extension, please keep in mind that
Stephan Lavavej has stated that the extension is poorly tested and sometimes
does weird things. This probably doesn't apply to the C++/CLI version.
Sebastian
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
