Oh dear, are they adopting the runtime-evaluated "sizeof" too??
On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 9:20 AM, Richard Smith <[email protected]> wrote: > Author: rsmith > Date: Sat Apr 20 08:20:33 2013 > New Revision: 179949 > > URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=179949&view=rev > Log: > VLAs in C++14! > > Modified: > cfe/trunk/www/cxx_status.html > > Modified: cfe/trunk/www/cxx_status.html > URL: > http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/www/cxx_status.html?rev=179949&r1=179948&r2=179949&view=diff > ============================================================================== > --- cfe/trunk/www/cxx_status.html (original) > +++ cfe/trunk/www/cxx_status.html Sat Apr 20 08:20:33 2013 > @@ -427,7 +427,7 @@ available.</p> > <td class="none" align="center">No</td> > </tr> > <tr> > - <td>[PROVISIONAL] Runtime-sized arrays with automatic storage > duration</td> > + <td>Runtime-sized arrays with automatic storage duration</td> > <td><a > href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2013/n3639.html";>N3639</a></td> > <td class="none" align="center">Partial</td> > </tr> > @@ -459,7 +459,7 @@ available.</p> > <tr> > <td>Clarifying memory allocation</td> > <td><a > href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2013/n3664.html";>N3664</a></td> > - <td class="none" align="center">No</td> > + <td class="none" align="center">Partial</td> > </tr> > </table> > > > > _______________________________________________ > cfe-commits mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
