On May 9, 2013, at 10:15 AM, Dmitri Gribenko <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> But it should still get a pedantic
>> diag::warn_unknown_comment_command_name diagnostic.
>>
>>
>> Are you sure. I intentionally left it out. It is going to be noisy with
>> pedantic.
>
> Pedantic is going to be noisy anyway, because it will warn even if
> there is no typo correction available. Pedantic should be, erm,
> pedantic, and warn about everything suspect -- that's the intent. It
> is feasible to be pedantic-clean when starting a new project (like
> clang codebase does), but for an existing project it will be noisy,
> and that's why it is off by default.
Ok then. In r181523.
- Fariborz
>
> Dmitri
>
> --
> main(i,j){for(i=2;;i++){for(j=2;j<i;j++){if(!(i%j)){j=0;break;}}if
> (j){printf("%d\n",i);}}} /*Dmitri Gribenko <[email protected]>*/
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
