> We should really rename getStorageClassSpec to getStorageClassSpecAsWritten, > too, to reduce the risk of it accidentally being used to determine the > storage class for a variable.
We always want these to be AsWritten, so renaming just this one looks a bit odd. My preference would be to keep the shorter name (i.e. LGTM Enea's patch), but if we are going to rename getStorageClassSpec we should rename getStorageClass too. Cheers, Rafael _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
