================
Comment at: lib/ASTMatchers/Dynamic/DynMatchers.cpp:35
@@ +34,3 @@
+ ast_matchers::internal::BoundNodesTreeBuilder *Builder) const {
+ return M1->matches(DynNode, Finder, Builder) ||
+ M2->matches(DynNode, Finder, Builder);
----------------
How much harder would it be to not re-implement the matchers? I'd like to keep
matcher implementations as cohesive as possible, as we want to be able to
change the implementations when we introduce new features.
http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D794
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
