> Yes. InternalLinkage + VisibleNoLinkage is externally visible under those > merging rules, and shouldn't be. > > Also, this doesn't match what I thought we were going to do to resolve that > DR (that you take the weakest linkage of a template and its arguments for a > template specialization). Why do you think these revised rules are better? > What's your model?
By revised rules you mean the one you proposed, making InternalLinkage VisibleNoLinkage -> NoLinkage UniqueExternalLinkage VisibleNoLinkage -> NoLinkage I am OK with it, but I was unable to write any testcase :-( Cheers, Rafael _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
