>> If those don't work, I think my only remaining objection to this patch >> is the option name sounds a bit too generic. What about dyld-path or >> even sanitazer-libc-path? > > I chose that name because the runtime sysroot could in principle affect > things other than the dynamic loader path, although I admittedly > can't think of a good example of something else it ought to affect. > --dyld-prefix sounds good to me since it's evident that it isn't the > entire path to the loader.
--dyld-prefix is probably a good name. Cheers, Rafael _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
