================
Comment at: lib/AST/MicrosoftMangle.cpp:263-264
@@ -262,2 +262,4 @@
// We don't even know how to mangle their types anyway :).
- const FunctionProtoType *FT = FD->getType()->castAs<FunctionProtoType>();
+ TypeSourceInfo *TSI = FD->getTypeSourceInfo();
+ QualType T = TSI ? TSI->getType() : FD->getType();
+ const FunctionProtoType *FT = T->castAs<FunctionProtoType>();
----------------
Richard Smith wrote:
> Which declaration is 'FD' here? If I have this in a header:
>
> void f(int p[123]);
>
> ... and this in my source file:
>
> #include "header"
> void f(int *const p) {}
>
> ... then do we use the mangling for the header's declaration or for the
> source file's declaration? I would guess (or rather, hope) that we use the
> mangling for the first declaration of the function.
ITYM
void f(int *p) {}
i.e. a redeclaration of f with a different mangling (the const qualified
version would have the same mangling).
http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D844
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
