On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 3:09 PM, Reid Kleckner <[email protected]> wrote:
> For a Type held by an AST node, I completely agree, and I'll try to > address that. For a type held by a TypeSourceInfo, I disagree, the > FunctionProtoType should really hold the undecayed parameter types. > Hmm... I was thinking more along the lines of keeping around the un-decayed type, but automatically decaying it for the user of the API unless they explicitly request the un-decayed version. I'm not sure I like keeping different versions of the type in the AST nodes vs. TypeSourceInfo. -Eli
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
