On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 9:13 AM, Jonathan Sauer <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello Richard, > >> Modified: >> cfe/trunk/www/cxx_dr_status.html > > As far as I can see there is currently no page linking to this DR status > page. When you > started this project, you wrote: > > | I've not linked to this page from anywhere, since it doesn't contain any > useful information > | yet. > > However, IMO this is no longer the case. I think it would make sense to link > to this page, e.g. > from cxx_status.html. I have attached a small patch to that effect. > > What do you think?
Generally, yes, I think the page is now useful enough to be worth linking in, even though I've only classified ~10% of the core issues so far. However, it's misleading to just put the link in the C++11 section, since it's not C++11-specific. We should also correct the claim that "Clang currently implements all of the ISO C++ 1998 standard (including the defects addressed in the ISO C++ 2003 standard)", since plenty of the "No"s so far are part of C++2003. _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
