On Jun 9, 2013, at 5:15 PM, Francois Pichet <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi, I would like to propose this patch to makes it possible to compile any 
> builtin if -fno-builtin is passed.
> 
> Here is the problem I am trying to get around.
> 
> I am working on a out-of-tree target where atomic operations are expanded to 
> function calls.
> for example:
>   setOperationAction(ISD::ATOMIC_SWAP,  MVT::i32, Expand);
> 
> 
> The backend will replace some atomic operations when compiling libc++ with 
> function calls. Now if I try to actually compile the function calls with 
> clang I'll get errors like:
>        definition of builtin function '__sync_lock_test_and_set_4'
> 
> Just as if I was trying to compile a file similar to 
> http://www.opensource.apple.com/source/Libc/Libc-583/arm/sys/gcc_atomic.c 
> with clang. 
> 
> Any objection? Or any possible workaround?

Should we even be recognizing this as a builtin under -fno-builtin?

John.
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to