This patch converts one method in Sema to ArrayRef.
Passes make test on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu

Please commit.

Thanks,
Robert
Index: include/clang/Sema/Sema.h
===================================================================
--- include/clang/Sema/Sema.h	(revision 184665)
+++ include/clang/Sema/Sema.h	(working copy)
@@ -7366,8 +7366,8 @@
   void CodeCompleteNamespaceAliasDecl(Scope *S);
   void CodeCompleteOperatorName(Scope *S);
   void CodeCompleteConstructorInitializer(Decl *Constructor,
-                                          CXXCtorInitializer** Initializers,
-                                          unsigned NumInitializers);
+                                   ArrayRef<CXXCtorInitializer *> Initializers);
+
   void CodeCompleteLambdaIntroducer(Scope *S, LambdaIntroducer &Intro,
                                     bool AfterAmpersand);
 
Index: lib/Parse/ParseDeclCXX.cpp
===================================================================
--- lib/Parse/ParseDeclCXX.cpp	(revision 184665)
+++ lib/Parse/ParseDeclCXX.cpp	(working copy)
@@ -2710,8 +2710,7 @@
   do {
     if (Tok.is(tok::code_completion)) {
       Actions.CodeCompleteConstructorInitializer(ConstructorDecl, 
-                                                 MemInitializers.data(), 
-                                                 MemInitializers.size());
+                                                 MemInitializers); 
       return cutOffParsing();
     } else {
       MemInitResult MemInit = ParseMemInitializer(ConstructorDecl);
Index: lib/Sema/SemaCodeComplete.cpp
===================================================================
--- lib/Sema/SemaCodeComplete.cpp	(revision 184665)
+++ lib/Sema/SemaCodeComplete.cpp	(working copy)
@@ -4242,8 +4242,7 @@
 }
 
 void Sema::CodeCompleteConstructorInitializer(Decl *ConstructorD,
-                                              CXXCtorInitializer** Initializers,
-                                              unsigned NumInitializers) {
+                                 ArrayRef <CXXCtorInitializer *> Initializers) {
   PrintingPolicy Policy = getCompletionPrintingPolicy(*this);
   CXXConstructorDecl *Constructor
     = static_cast<CXXConstructorDecl *>(ConstructorD);
@@ -4258,7 +4257,7 @@
   // Fill in any already-initialized fields or base classes.
   llvm::SmallPtrSet<FieldDecl *, 4> InitializedFields;
   llvm::SmallPtrSet<CanQualType, 4> InitializedBases;
-  for (unsigned I = 0; I != NumInitializers; ++I) {
+  for (unsigned I = 0, E = Initializers.size(); I != E; ++I) {
     if (Initializers[I]->isBaseInitializer())
       InitializedBases.insert(
         Context.getCanonicalType(QualType(Initializers[I]->getBaseClass(), 0)));
@@ -4270,17 +4269,17 @@
   // Add completions for base classes.
   CodeCompletionBuilder Builder(Results.getAllocator(),
                                 Results.getCodeCompletionTUInfo());
-  bool SawLastInitializer = (NumInitializers == 0);
+  bool SawLastInitializer = Initializers.empty();
   CXXRecordDecl *ClassDecl = Constructor->getParent();
   for (CXXRecordDecl::base_class_iterator Base = ClassDecl->bases_begin(),
                                        BaseEnd = ClassDecl->bases_end();
        Base != BaseEnd; ++Base) {
     if (!InitializedBases.insert(Context.getCanonicalType(Base->getType()))) {
       SawLastInitializer
-        = NumInitializers > 0 && 
-          Initializers[NumInitializers - 1]->isBaseInitializer() &&
+        = !Initializers.empty() && 
+          Initializers.back()->isBaseInitializer() &&
           Context.hasSameUnqualifiedType(Base->getType(),
-               QualType(Initializers[NumInitializers - 1]->getBaseClass(), 0));
+               QualType(Initializers.back()->getBaseClass(), 0));
       continue;
     }
     
@@ -4302,10 +4301,10 @@
        Base != BaseEnd; ++Base) {
     if (!InitializedBases.insert(Context.getCanonicalType(Base->getType()))) {
       SawLastInitializer
-        = NumInitializers > 0 && 
-          Initializers[NumInitializers - 1]->isBaseInitializer() &&
+        = !Initializers.empty() && 
+          Initializers.back()->isBaseInitializer() &&
           Context.hasSameUnqualifiedType(Base->getType(),
-               QualType(Initializers[NumInitializers - 1]->getBaseClass(), 0));
+               QualType(Initializers.back()->getBaseClass(), 0));
       continue;
     }
     
@@ -4327,9 +4326,9 @@
        Field != FieldEnd; ++Field) {
     if (!InitializedFields.insert(cast<FieldDecl>(Field->getCanonicalDecl()))) {
       SawLastInitializer
-        = NumInitializers > 0 && 
-          Initializers[NumInitializers - 1]->isAnyMemberInitializer() &&
-          Initializers[NumInitializers - 1]->getAnyMember() == *Field;
+        = !Initializers.empty() && 
+          Initializers.back()->isAnyMemberInitializer() &&
+          Initializers.back()->getAnyMember() == *Field;
       continue;
     }
     
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to