On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 9:03 AM, Jordan Rose <[email protected]> wrote:
> There aren't any...all of the symmetrical operations require both > arguments to be of the same type. I'm pretty sure the "Special case" below > for the compare-and-swap functions is now dead code. > That sounds plausible to me. Do you think it'd worth adding an assertion that we never get a comparison > op here? > Yep, removing the isComparisonOp() code path, and adding an assert to ensure it isn't reached (before the rhs.isZeroConstant() check) sounds good to me.
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
