On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 1:02 AM, James Dennett <[email protected]> wrote: > I have a patch to follow this to fix > RecursiveASTVisitor::TraverseLambdaExpr, but testing it requires use > of C++11 lambdas (strangely enough), so this (tiny) patch is a > precursor to enable that test. > > I kept the default as C++98 for now, and I didn't add an explicit > Lang_C99 or Lang_CXX1Y (figuring that they can be added if/when > they're needed). > > I'd like to get a sanity check before I commit this. Any takers?
Any reason not to remap Lang_CXX to C++11? _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
