Ping?
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 8:44 AM, Aaron Ballman <[email protected]> wrote: > Ping? > > On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 1:34 PM, Aaron Ballman <[email protected]> wrote: >> Based on feedback from Richard, here is another pass at modifying >> tablegen for Subjects support. The delta here is that templates have >> been removed and replaced by a method pair (one for Decl and one for >> Stmt). The usage is still the same as before: you can call >> appertainsTo and pass in something you want to know whether the >> attribute appertains to it or not, and it will return a Boolean. >> >> ~Aaron >> >> On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 5:34 PM, Aaron Ballman <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> This patch adds support for the Subjects part of the Attr tablegen >>> file. Specifically, it modifies tablegen to pay attention to >>> Subjects, and emit a templated member function for attribute >>> subclasses called appertainTo. The purpose is to be able to determine >>> whether a given attribute appertains to a particular subject. >>> >>> template <typename Subject> >>> bool appertainTo(const Subject *S) const; >>> >>> If the attribute has no subjects, then the default behavior of >>> appertainTo is to return true. This makes it backwards compatible >>> with the fact that we've always ignored subjects previously (and many >>> attributes do not have a specific subject specified). >>> >>> If the attribute does have subjects, then the default appertainTo will >>> return false, but specializations will be generated that return true >>> for each subject case. If the subject happens to be a SubsetSubject, >>> the code from CheckCode is emitted (hence the reason for having the >>> subject passed into the function) and the proper base is taken from >>> the subject. >>> >>> ~Aaron _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
