On Jul 8, 2013, at 1:41 PM, Eli Friedman <[email protected]> wrote:

> In the process of reviewing this, I ended up with a significantly
> different patch; r185857.  I'd appreciate it if you would look it over
> to see if it makes sense.

Yeah, it LGTM.

        - Doug

> -Eli
> 
> On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 10:33 PM, Serge Pavlov <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Friendly ping.
>> 
>> 
>> 2013/4/25 Serge Pavlov <[email protected]>
>>> 
>>> 
>>>  There was a similar proposition in another problem
>>> http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D673, result of the discussion - atomic
>>> types must be transformed before such checks. This approach is used in this
>>> fix.
>>> 
>>> http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D599
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> Thanks,
>> --Serge
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> cfe-commits mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to