On Jul 9, 2013, at 17:24 , jahanian <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> +@property(weak) NSString *__weak WeakProp;
>>> +
>>> +@property(strong) NSString * StrongProp;
>>
>> Conventionally, I'd expect the __weak to disappear and the "strong" to be
>> implied instead of explicitly spelled out.
>
> __weak came from user code. migration did not generate it. removed “strong”
> from migrated attributes.
I see that it came from user code; it should go away during the migration.
Actually, most "weak" properties will not look like this. A weak implicit
property will have a normal signature for the getter and setter, but the
backing ivar will be __weak.
You really can't migrate properties without looking at the setter
implementation. In that sense it's pushing more info into the interface, not
less.
Jordan
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
