On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 11:56 PM, Lubos Lunak <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tuesday 16 of July 2013, Eli Friedman wrote: >> On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 2:35 PM, Lubos Lunak <[email protected]> wrote: >> > On Monday 01 of July 2013, Eli Friedman wrote: >> >> On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 11:49 PM, Lubos Lunak <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > Hello, >> >> > >> >> > could somebody please review and commit the atached patch for >> >> > pr14831? Thank >> >> > you. >> >> >> >> Testcase? >> > >> > Updated patch attached. >> >> LGTM. >> >> Please read http://llvm.org/docs/DeveloperPolicy.html and request commit >> access. > > I can do that if it's only about making pushing of my patches less work, but > I don't think I can fully comply with the requirements. Specifically, I don't > have the time for the 'Stay Informed' section (it took me two weeks just to > update a trivial patch) and in fact I intend to unsubscribe again when I have > no patches pending.
It's primarily about making pushing patches less work, yes. The "stay informed" policy isn't directly linked to commit access policy. -Eli _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
