I think we want to have a whitelist of "clang options" that are distinct from gcc options, rather than blacklisting a troublesome few (-MD) as GCCOptions. That seemed to be the main conclusion of the discussion on cfe-dev.
We obviously don't want to add Flags<[ClangOption]> to every option in f_Group and f_clang_Group, so there'll have to be some tablegen magic in there. Does that seem reasonable? On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 8:38 PM, Hans Wennborg <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi all, > > The attached patch makes clang-cl handle the /? and /help command-line > flags. > > These are both just aliases to the regular -help flag, but this puts > the code in place for accepting (and printing as part of the help > message) different flags depending on the driver mode. > > Please take a look! > > Thanks, > Hans >
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
