On Jul 29, 2013, at 10:48 AM, Marshall Clow <[email protected]> wrote:
> Ridding the galaxy of run-time requirements, one paper at a time. > Today quest: complex. Thanks Marshall! We're missing documentation, implementation and tests for section d) of the proposal: d) Modify 26.4.7 [complex.value.ops] as follows: template<class T> constexpr T real(const complex<T>& x); template<class T> constexpr T imag(const complex<T>& x); These are the namespace scope real/imag overloads. Additionally I interpret this modified standard to mean that the extra real/imag overloads specified by [cmplx.over] should also be made constexpr. Howard _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
