On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 3:48 AM, Richard Smith <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Perhaps we should lazily construct and store a SanitizerArgs instance on > the Driver, and share it between the various places that want to inspect > the sanitizer arguments? > That's what first comes to mind. If it fits in the driver architecture and doesn't add unwanted global state, I can implement this. > > I don't think there's any good reason that the SanitizerArgs > implementation mostly lives in the header. Since it's only included into > two .cpp files, I don't think it matters much. Fix if you like :-) > Okay, will do. > > http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1300 > -- Alexey Samsonov, MSK
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
