On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 11:44 PM, Charles Davis <[email protected]> wrote: > > This flag should be doing more stuff. This flag is supposed to request > strict ANSI conformance (according to Microsoft's, uh... "unique" > interpretation of that). That means at least (in GCC terms) > `-fno-ms-extensions`, in addition to not auto-linking `OLDNAMES.LIB`. (The > `/Ze` flag undoes the effects of `/Za`.) > > I seem to recall someone from MS on `cfe-dev` (and yes, they do exist!) > saying that `/Za` is broken and shouldn't be used (cf. "/Za considered > harmful" or some such). Are you sure you want to implement it, given that?
Right. It's not obvious what we should do for /Za. We can't disable -fms-compatibility for instance, because then we couldn't parse some template code that cl.exe would accept under /Za, etc. However, since I just added the oldnames.lib thing in a previous patch, I think it makes sense to hook up this flag as way of turning that off. - Hans _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
