================
Comment at: include/clang/ASTMatchers/Dynamic/VariantValue.h:140
@@ +139,3 @@
+  };
+  union {
+    SingleRep *AsSingle;
----------------
Manuel Klimek wrote:
> Any reason not to use an interface with two implementations? This smells a 
> lot like building our own inheritance implementation ...
These two could hide behind an interface, but I don't know how the interface 
would work for the variadic case coming next (from D1427).
The basic idea for that one is that on getTypedMatcher<T> it will convert all 
the inner matchers to Matcher<T>, then create a 
VariadicOperatorMatcherInterface<T> with them and return it.
If I try to use interfaces, I will need two: one for the payload of the 
matcher, and one for the operations from <T>. It can be done, but it might be 
messier.
I'll give it a try to see how it looks.


http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1446
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to