On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 4:41 PM, Rafael Espíndola < [email protected]> wrote:
> > Any reason not to remove this, and instead look at the argument to the > OPT_O > > option? > > > > (Likewise, why do we have a separate -O0 flag?) > > Just convenience. It is easier to write > > A->getOption().matches(options::OPT_O4) > > Than to check it matches OPT_O, get the value, check if it is integer and > == 4. > Maybe we should warn for all integers >= 4 though. -- Sean Silva > > Cheers, > Rafael > _______________________________________________ > cfe-commits mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits >
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
