On Aug 29, 2013, at 7:53 PM, Richard Smith wrote: > On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 6:48 PM, Charles Davis <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Aug 29, 2013, at 7:38 PM, Richard Smith wrote: > >> On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 6:12 PM, Reid Kleckner <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 6:11 PM, Richard Smith <[email protected]> wrote: >> I'd prefer that the ms_abi and sysv_abi attributes are instead mapped to >> different calling conventions on different targets (so we never use >> CC_X86_64SysV in cases where it is the same as CC_C). >> >> I believe the last patch implements that. >> >> Hmm, maybe I'm looking at the wrong patch then. The patch that I'm looking >> at always maps AT_MSABI to CC_X86_64Win64, then does a fixup from that to >> CC_C in checkCallingConvention for some targets. > Heh. :) > > I think I know what he's talking about. Something like this, maybe? > > Perfect =) Excellent! No further objections, I trust?
Chip > > Chip > >> _______________________________________________ >> cfe-commits mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits > > >
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
