Sure. Is the attached patch OK?
On 3 September 2013 19:36, David Blaikie <[email protected]> wrote: > Can you just drop the -O entirely? > > On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 4:31 PM, Rafael Espindola > <[email protected]> wrote: >> Author: rafael >> Date: Tue Sep 3 18:31:28 2013 >> New Revision: 189884 >> >> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=189884&view=rev >> Log: >> Use -O0 in this test too. >> >> Modified: >> cfe/trunk/test/CodeGenCXX/vtable-available-externally.cpp >> >> Modified: cfe/trunk/test/CodeGenCXX/vtable-available-externally.cpp >> URL: >> http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/test/CodeGenCXX/vtable-available-externally.cpp?rev=189884&r1=189883&r2=189884&view=diff >> ============================================================================== >> --- cfe/trunk/test/CodeGenCXX/vtable-available-externally.cpp (original) >> +++ cfe/trunk/test/CodeGenCXX/vtable-available-externally.cpp Tue Sep 3 >> 18:31:28 2013 >> @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ >> -// RUN: %clang_cc1 %s -I%S -triple=x86_64-apple-darwin10 -emit-llvm -O3 -o >> %t >> +// RUN: %clang_cc1 %s -I%S -triple=x86_64-apple-darwin10 -emit-llvm -O0 -o >> %t >> // RUN: FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK-TEST1 %s < %t >> // RUN: FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK-TEST2 %s < %t >> // RUN: FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK-TEST5 %s < %t >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> cfe-commits mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
t.patch
Description: Binary data
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
