Drat! I knew it was too good to be true. ;-) Thanks! ~Aaron
On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 1:28 PM, Richard Smith <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 4 Sep 2013 10:16, "Aaron Ballman" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> With the refactorings that have been happening for attribute parsing, >> it seems this piece of custom parsing logic for thread safety analysis >> can go away. The only real modification here is the updated test case >> which provides a definition for two functions; I wanted to make sure I >> was not subverting the intention of the test. > > Sadly, you are. We need the unevaluated context around the expression > parsing here. But I suspect most of the duplication can still be factored > out. _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
