I'm not sure. I guess it's fine not to bother. Jordan
On Sep 5, 2013, at 17:23 , Alexander Kornienko <[email protected]> wrote: > It's an interesting idea. I'm slightly worried about the need to maintain > cross-file consistency though. Is something similar already used in > LLVM/clang tests? > > On Sep 6, 2013 2:10 AM, "Jordan Rose" <[email protected]> wrote: > > Let's drop the CHECK-MACHINE case, but otherwise this looks good. > > However, if you care about keeping the test files in sync, how about just > making this file only contain CHECK lines, and actually compile the original > fixit-unicode.c? That allows you to specify the XFAIL properly while avoiding > duplication. > > http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1607
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
