On Sep 12, 2013, at 2:46 PM, Hal Finkel <[email protected]> wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- >> On Sep 12, 2013, at 2:14 PM, Hal Finkel <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> I've been thinking about constructing a patch to implement >>> __builtin_vectorconvert(type, value), do you think that is a >>> reasonable approach? >> >> It would be nice if what you come up with is capable of being >> extended to include rounding and saturation, like the OpenCL >> convert_* ops. Obviously that blows up the space enormously, so I >> wouldn’t expect anyone to do them all at once. > > Do you have a recommended design? I could do something like this: > __builtin_vectorconvert(type, value, rnd = 0, sat = 0) > where the last two parameters are integers with default values specifying the > rounding mode and a saturation parameter.
I am very much the wrong person to ask, but that seems reasonable to me. – Steve _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
