On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 6:10 PM, Reid Kleckner <[email protected]> wrote:
> Because it's already considered a system header, or because it shouldn't > have warnings? > Because it should already be considered a system header. -Eli > > The header does have warnings, because other system headers provide > prototypes for these intrinsics, and they don't apply static, inline, or > __forceinline / always_inline. > > We may have only ween warnings as a result of including this file directly. > > > On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 6:01 PM, Eli Friedman <[email protected]>wrote: > >> >> The "#pragma clang system_header" shouldn't be necessary. >> >> http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1766 >> > >
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
