And here is also the patch file reattached from the original posting. - Mikael
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 10:35 AM, Mikael Lepistö <mikael.lepi...@vincit.fi>wrote: > Hi, I submitted this patch ~20 days ago. Could this get some > comments/review if the solution is acceptable or if there is some other > preferred way to implement it? > > Thanks, Mikael > > > On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 8:37 AM, Mikael Lepistö > <mikael.lepi...@vincit.fi>wrote: > >> Hi, ping >> >> I sent this simple patch some time ago to list, but it got no responses. >> Is there any estimates, when this might be reviewed or added to main repo? >> >> Thanks, Mikael Lepistö >> >> >> I also added missing [PATCH] tag to subject (I forgot to to put it to >> original mail). >> >> On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 12:49 PM, Mikael Lepistö <mikael.lepi...@vincit.fi >> > wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> We needed in our project ( >>> https://github.com/KhronosGroup/webcl-validator) to be able to define >>> callbacks for handling OpenCL extension pragmas to catch easily which >>> OpenCL extensions are enabled/disabled. >>> >>> I attached the patch file and test case for the functionality. Rami >>> Ylimäki is actually author of the implementation I just wrote the test case >>> and cleaned up the patch for upstreaming. >>> >>> I had to add clangParse and clangSema libraries to PPCallbacksTest >>> compilation, because enabling OpenCL support for preprocessor required >>> Parser instance. Parser instance actually reads LangOptions from >>> preprocessor and registers correct pragma handlers to preprocessor. >>> >>> Any comments, improvements? >>> >>> Cheers, Mikael Lepistö >>> >>> >>> >> >
clang_opencl_extension_pragma_callbacks.diff
Description: Binary data
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@cs.uiuc.edu http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
