On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 11:40 AM, Rafael Espíndola < [email protected]> wrote:
> > I really disagree with the direction of this patch. > > > > Currently we have succeeded at factoring all of the GCC '-f' > flag-spelling > > compatibility into the driver, and keeping it out of the frontend. I > would > > personally rather keep it that way, and have a much more constrained and > > justified command line flag interface at the CC1 boundary. I find this > > separation of concerns extremely useful. > > If the -cc1 option handling can be made *really* simple, I would be ok > with it. By really simple I mean something like "all boolean options > default to false, the driver just passes a list of flags to enable". Busy in committee at the moment, so not likely to get to a proper review, but just for the record I really like the separation of concerns even if the handling is simple.
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
