Hi Bob, Since I believe it was you who objected somewhat to this last time around, do you have any opinion on this? Thanks.
Regards, Bradley Smith > > On 2 October 2013 16:09, Bradley Smith <[email protected]> wrote: > > > All poly types should be of unsigned type, > > > > I proposed this back in January, and I think we reached the > conclusion > > that this change should be coordinated with GCC since it's > potentially > > ABI-breaking. > > > > Do you know if there's been any progress on the GCC side? I think > they > > (Richard Earnshaw & Tejas) were intending to wait until 4.8.0 had > been > > released before proposing the change there. > > Unfortunately not much it seems, it's still very much on their TODO > list > for 4.8 so will happen at some point, we're just not sure exactly when. > Given this is now specified in the ACLE as unsigned so has to change in > GCC, > it might be nice for clang to take the lead on this one rather than > waiting > for GCC. > > Also as you stated in your previous thread, which I just found, it's > extraordinarily unlikely that many people if anybody will actually be > affected > by this change differing across clang and GCC until GCC changes it. _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
