No, it does not affect generic lambdas. It sounded like you wanted local classes to allow templated members so it seemed logical to beef them up a bit
On Monday, October 14, 2013, Richard Smith wrote: > > Does this also affect generic lambdas? If not, this is in conflict with > another patch out for review that makes us reject template members of > local > classes. > > http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1932 > _______________________________________________ > cfe-commits mailing list > [email protected] <javascript:;> > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits >
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
