It had the same behavior as gcc when the -Wcast-qual flag was used, so maybe the comment is incorrect?
-bw On Oct 17, 2013, at 5:28 AM, Rafael Espíndola <[email protected]> wrote: > The comment says it should *not* warn, so it doesn't look fixed. > > On 17 October 2013 00:13, Bill Wendling <[email protected]> wrote: >> Author: void >> Date: Wed Oct 16 23:13:35 2013 >> New Revision: 192869 >> >> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=192869&view=rev >> Log: >> This is now passing. Uncomment and close out PR6281. >> >> Modified: >> cfe/trunk/test/Sema/warn-unused-function.c >> >> Modified: cfe/trunk/test/Sema/warn-unused-function.c >> URL: >> http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/test/Sema/warn-unused-function.c?rev=192869&r1=192868&r2=192869&view=diff >> ============================================================================== >> --- cfe/trunk/test/Sema/warn-unused-function.c (original) >> +++ cfe/trunk/test/Sema/warn-unused-function.c Wed Oct 16 23:13:35 2013 >> @@ -12,10 +12,8 @@ int x = sizeof(f0()); >> static void f3(); >> extern void f3() { } // expected-warning{{unused}} >> >> -// FIXME: This will trigger a warning when it should not. >> -// Update once PR6281 is fixed. >> -//inline static void f4(); >> -//void f4() { } >> +inline static void f4(); >> +void f4() { } // expected-warning{{unused}} >> >> static void __attribute__((used)) f5() {} >> static void f6(); >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> cfe-commits mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
