Hi nlewycky,
gcc treats [[gnu:const]], [[gnu::__const]], and [[gnu:__const__]] as all being
equivalent. Add an additional test case to ensure that we do not miss the last
case.
http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2048
Files:
test/Parser/cxx0x-attributes.cpp
Index: test/Parser/cxx0x-attributes.cpp
===================================================================
--- test/Parser/cxx0x-attributes.cpp
+++ test/Parser/cxx0x-attributes.cpp
@@ -309,8 +309,10 @@
// GCC's tokenizer treats const and __const as the same token.
[[gnu::const]] int *f1();
[[gnu::__const]] int *f2();
+ [[gnu::__const__]] int *f3();
void f(const int *);
void g() { f(f1()); f(f2()); }
+ void h() { f(f3()); }
}
namespace GccASan {
Index: test/Parser/cxx0x-attributes.cpp
===================================================================
--- test/Parser/cxx0x-attributes.cpp
+++ test/Parser/cxx0x-attributes.cpp
@@ -309,8 +309,10 @@
// GCC's tokenizer treats const and __const as the same token.
[[gnu::const]] int *f1();
[[gnu::__const]] int *f2();
+ [[gnu::__const__]] int *f3();
void f(const int *);
void g() { f(f1()); f(f2()); }
+ void h() { f(f3()); }
}
namespace GccASan {
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits