Don't suppose I can get you to upload these to phabricator? http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/
Thanks! -eric On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 2:51 AM, Robert Lytton <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > I've separated the handling of "-fverbose-asm" into its own patch. > Are they good to go from a clang perspective? > > PatchVerbose: > XCore target: Pass through "-fverbose-asm" flag to xcc assembler. > > PatchException: > XCore target exception handling > > XCore target has -fno-exception as the default option > Implement __builtin_eh_return_data_regno() > Pass on "-fexceptions" flag to xcc (linker) > > Robert > > ________________________________ > From: Robert Lytton > Sent: 11 November 2013 13:57 > To: [email protected] > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: FW: XCore target exception handling > > Hi Eric, > Rafael suggested I pinged you. > Would you be able to review the patch from a clang perspective? > Robert > > > ________________________________ > From: [email protected] [[email protected]] on > behalf of Robert Lytton [[email protected]] > Sent: 01 November 2013 18:00 > To: [email protected] > Subject: XCore target exception handling > > Hi > > Here is a patch for exception handling on the XCore target. > > XCore target has -fno-exception as the default option > Implement __builtin_eh_return_data_regno() > Pass on flags to xcc (assembler & linker phases) > > Thank you. > Robert > > > > > _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
