Hi Bill, Please pull this bugfix onto the 3.4 branch
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 8:03 PM, Richard Smith <[email protected]>wrote: > If the test fails without it, then yes. > > > On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 4:55 PM, David Majnemer > <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Do we want this merged into 3.4? >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> > On Nov 27, 2013, at 7:13 PM, Kaelyn Uhrain <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > Author: rikka >> > Date: Wed Nov 27 18:13:38 2013 >> > New Revision: 195897 >> > >> > URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=195897&view=rev >> > Log: >> > Add a return statement to the func with an int return type. >> > >> > Modified: >> > cfe/trunk/test/SemaTemplate/instantiate-local-class.cpp >> > >> > Modified: cfe/trunk/test/SemaTemplate/instantiate-local-class.cpp >> > URL: >> http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/test/SemaTemplate/instantiate-local-class.cpp?rev=195897&r1=195896&r2=195897&view=diff >> > >> ============================================================================== >> > --- cfe/trunk/test/SemaTemplate/instantiate-local-class.cpp (original) >> > +++ cfe/trunk/test/SemaTemplate/instantiate-local-class.cpp Wed Nov 27 >> 18:13:38 2013 >> > @@ -178,5 +178,6 @@ namespace PR14373 { >> > }; >> > int call() { >> > exec_func(Type()); >> > + return 0; >> > } >> > } >> > >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > cfe-commits mailing list >> > [email protected] >> > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits >> > >
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
