Added in. Thanks!

-bw

On Dec 2, 2013, at 11:28 PM, Ana Pazos <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Bill and Tim,
>  
> Thanks for merging all the patches to branch 3.4. We will have a couple more 
> coming this week to complete Neon intrinsics implementation.
>  
> Here are the patches from me that need to go to 3.4 branch:
> Clang:
> r196206 Fixed vcopy_laneq_f64 intrinsic implementation
> 196153: Implemented vcopy_lane patterns using scalar DUP instruction
> LLVM:
> 196151 Implemented vcopy_lane patterns using scalar DUP instruction
>  
> Thank you,
> Ana.
> From: Bill Wendling [mailto:[email protected]] 
> Sent: Saturday, November 30, 2013 8:40 PM
> To: Jiangning Liu
> Cc: Ana Pazos; Jiangning Liu; llvm-commits; cfe-commits
> Subject: Re: [PATCH][AArch64] request to push AArch64 patches to release 3.4 
> branch
>  
> Hi Jiangning,
>  
> Thanks for the list! I added them into the 3.4 release branch. Please let me 
> know if there are any I missed.
>  
> -bw
>  
> On Nov 29, 2013, at 6:36 PM, Jiangning Liu <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> 
> Hi Bill,
>  
> Now we have a couple new patches for 3.4 release, so could you please help to 
> merge them into the branch?
>  
> r195068
> Clean up predefined macros for AArch64 to follow ACLE 2.0.
> r195069 r195071
> All crypto intrinsics should be unavailable when crypto feature is not 
> enabled        
> r195073 r195074
> Implement SISD intrinsics for vget_high and vget_low
> r195713
> Implement 128 bit register copy with NEON.
> r195903
> *** Fix the problem that AArch64 Post-index LD4 lane is decoded incorrectly
> r195844 r195843 r195905 r195932
> *** Fix the failure exposed by checking constant integer argument range
> r195937
> Add missing intrinsic vcombine_f64
> r195936
> *** Fix An assertion failure caused by disassembling AArch64 SHLL instruction
> r195938 r195939 r195940
> Add missing intrinsic bsl_f64
> r195941 r195942
> *** The pattern match should check the range of the immediate
> r195943
> *** Some ACLE intrinsics in arm_neon.h return float32 instead of float64.
>  
> The ones marked with "***" are critical ones because they are bug fixes 
> either for MCLayer or ACLE, and they should go into branch with the high 
> priority.
> 
> Ideally we want all of them go into branch, because they are combined all 
> together as a big feature for AArch64 NEON implementation.
> 
> Thanks,
> -Jiangning
>  
> 
>  
> 
> 2013/11/26 Bill Wendling <[email protected]>
> Sure. done.
>  
> -bw
>  
> On Nov 25, 2013, at 8:32 PM, Jiangning Liu <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> 
> Bill,
> Can you merge r195716 to branch 3.4 as well?
> Thanks,
> -Jiangning
>  
> 
> 2013/11/26 Bill Wendling <[email protected]>
> Sure. Done.
>  
> -bw
>  
>  
> 
> On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 9:59 AM, Ana Pazos <[email protected]> wrote:
> Thank you Bill,
> 
> We have a fix from Hao that should also go into branch 3.4 (it's a fix of
> encoding error for ld/st instruction): r195591
> 
> Can you merge it too, please.
> 
> Thanks,
> Ana.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bill Wendling [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Sunday, November 24, 2013 9:44 PM
> To: Tim Northover
> Cc: Ana Pazos; llvm-commits; [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [PATCH][AArch64] request to push AArch64 patches to release 3.4
> branch
> 
> Sure. Merged.
> 
> -bw
> 
> On Nov 22, 2013, at 10:53 AM, Tim Northover <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > Hi Ana & Bill,
> >
> >> Committed revision 195326
> >> Committed revision 195329
> >> Committed revision 195327
> >> Committed revision 195330
> >
> > I'm happy for these to go in. The interested parties are keen and they
> > should only affect AArch64 with -mattr=+neon, which I don't think is
> > being widely used at the moment (and itself almost certainly won't be
> > made worse).
> >
> > Cheers.
> >
> > Tim.
> 
> 
>  
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cfe-commits mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
> 
> 
> 
>  
> --
> Thanks,
> -Jiangning
>  
> 
> 
> 
> --
> Thanks,
> -Jiangning

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to