On Dec 3, 2013, at 13:11, Argyrios Kyrtzidis <[email protected]> wrote:
> +void ObjCInterfaceDecl::getDesignatedInitializers(
> + llvm::SmallVectorImpl<const ObjCMethodDecl *> &Methods) const {
> + assert(hasDefinition());
> + if (data().ExternallyCompleted)
> + LoadExternalDefinition();
> +
> + const ObjCInterfaceDecl *IFace = this;
> + while (IFace) {
> + if (IFace->data().HasDesignatedInitializers)
> + break;
> + IFace = IFace->getSuperClass();
> + }
> +
> + if (!IFace)
> + return;
> + for (instmeth_iterator I = IFace->instmeth_begin(),
> + E = IFace->instmeth_end(); I != E; ++I) {
> + const ObjCMethodDecl *MD = *I;
> + if (MD->getMethodFamily() == OMF_init &&
> + MD->hasAttr<ObjCDesignatedInitializerAttr>())
> + Methods.push_back(MD);
> + }
> +}
Is this correct? This says that even if I declare new init methods (and don't
mark any as designated), the designated initializers are still my superclass's
designated initializers. I think this is a backwards-compatibility problem for
people shipping subclasses with new init methods.
Jordan
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
