On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 1:01 AM, Alp Toker <[email protected]> wrote: > On 05/12/2013 08:43, Richard Smith wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 12:23 AM, Alp Toker <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi Richard, >> >> Think it'd make sense to reverse the order of the status page to put >> newer standards at the top? >> >> Right now you have to do a lot of scrolling to get to anything >> interesting. Search engines also seem to be focusing on C++98 for the >> search results summary. >> > > Yes, the page is definitely getting unwieldy. Perhaps adding a table of > contents at the top of the page would help more than reordering the > sections? I would guess people are hitting this page for C++11 as much as > they are for C++14. > > > Well, I'd go for new features on the top based on the assumption that > someone looking for C++11 is still going to find the C++14 status more > informative than paging through historic standards.
Just my 2 cents but I'd keep it ordered as is. I expect that at some point, we'll condense the C++11 stuff to the same amount of detail we provide for C++98 now. ;] And so on. So that the baseline is at the top, and everything else are deltas. This isn't new though, that's how we handled C++98: per-feature check boxes until we were done and satisfied, then a simple statement.
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
