I am fine with that. On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 10:48:05AM -0800, Nico Weber wrote: > Hi, > > it looks like gcc spells bit_FXSR like bit_FXSAVE by mistake, but they also > don't want to fix this ( > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-10/msg02158.html ). This causes for > example a compiler ifdef in breakpad ( https://breakpad.appspot.com/924002/). > > To make things simpler, the attached patch adds support for gcc's spelling > too. > > Nico
> Index: lib/Headers/cpuid.h > =================================================================== > --- lib/Headers/cpuid.h (revision 197300) > +++ lib/Headers/cpuid.h (working copy) > @@ -79,6 +79,7 @@ > #define bit_ACPI 0x00400000 > #define bit_MMX 0x00800000 > #define bit_FXSR 0x01000000 > +#define bit_FXSAVE bit_FXSR > #define bit_SSE 0x02000000 > #define bit_SSE2 0x04000000 > #define bit_SS 0x08000000 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
