Hi Howard, I am doing some experiment to replace stlport with libc++ in the Android platform, which does not have libstdc++. Although I can compile the libc++ library itself with clang, I can't build the world with clang at the moment. Thus, I wish to make the C++98/03 headers compatible with g++, so that I can include them without problems.
Sincerely, Logan On Sat, Dec 28, 2013 at 1:05 AM, Howard Hinnant <[email protected]>wrote: > Hi Logan, > > Could you comment on the motivation for using g++ + libc++. I.e., why use > libc++ instead of the libstdc++ that comes bundled with g++? > > Thanks, > Howard > > On Dec 26, 2013, at 11:08 AM, Logan Chien <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Ping. > > > > > > On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 10:53 PM, Logan Chien <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Ping. Any further comments? > > > > This patch tries to reduce the usage of the default function template > arguments, which is not supported in pre-C++0x. Without this change, we > will get compilation error from g++ if we tries to include libc++ headers > in pre-C++0x mode. > > > > To remove the usage of default function template arguments, the patch > moves the enable_if<> to return type or the function argument types. This > pattern is used in the other code of libc++ as well. > > > > Please let me know if you have any comments. Thanks. > > > > Sincerely, > > Logan > > > > _______________________________________________ > > cfe-commits mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits > >
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
