It would be really nice to not require a bootstrap of gcc-4.8 for stage-1
clang, but FSF gcc-4.8 give me unresolved issues on powerpc-darwin8. I'd
rather focus my limited time on in-tree issues in llvm/clang. It's already
a small chore maintaining this long-lived branch.
Anyways, that's my $0.025. Please consider this wish before landing that
first C++11-ized patch?
Is there a particular reason you can't use the 3.4 release branch for this?
That was the goal of waiting until now.
Hi,
I've actually created a powerpc-darwin8-rel-3.4 branch that tracks
'release_34', and tried to backport some of the fixes that missed the 3.4
branch. This branch isn't able to build stage-2 yet. Trunk however,
*can* build stage-2, but I haven't been able to identify the trunk commit
that fixed PR 15901 and 15965, stage-2 blockers. Even if we identify that
patch and backport, Iain and I stil have several diagnostics and fixes in
the works. Depending on how far trunk has diverged from the 3.4 brach, we
*may* be able to backport those fixes as well. I will certainly make an
effort.
David
--
David Fang
http://www.csl.cornell.edu/~fang/
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
