r198694, thanks!
On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 12:02 AM, Daniel Jasper <[email protected]> wrote: > Sounds like a good idea to me! > On Jan 7, 2014 6:55 AM, "Nico Weber" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> `clang-format --version` currently uses llvm's default version formatter >> which looks like this: >> >> $ clang-format --version >> LLVM (http://llvm.org/): >> LLVM version 3.5svn >> Optimized build with assertions. >> Built Jan 3 2014 (14:28:46). >> Default target: x86_64-apple-darwin13.0.0 >> Host CPU: core-avx-i >> >> This includes all kinds of stuff that's not interesting for a code >> formatter, and it lacks the revision clang-format was built at. In >> comparison, `clang --version` prints >> >> $ bin/clang --version >> clang version 3.5 (198452) >> Target: x86_64-apple-darwin13.0.0 >> Thread model: posix >> >> which I think is much better (but Target: and arguably Thread model: >> aren't interesting for a formatter either). >> >> The attached patch changes the output of `clang-format --version` to be >> just >> >> $ bin/clang-format --version >> clang-format version 3.5 (198452) >> >> The part I care about most is including the revision number. >> >> Ok? >> >> Nico >> >
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
