I think it's a good idea to have more code owners in Clang. Alp has definitely contributed some nice cleanups in the Parser (and elsewhere) recently, and doesn't show signs of stopping :-)
My vote is "LGTM". Just my 2 pence, Joey On 10 Jan 2014 16:57, "Alp Toker" <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Doug, > > I've been helping to maintain the parser for a while and we haven't had an > explicit code owner for some time. > > The attached patch updates CODE_OWNERS.TXT to provide a clear point of > contact. > > I see this mostly as a janitorial role looking to tackle the PR and patch > review queue more proactively, while helping to coordinate ongoing > modernization work to meet the needs of the community. > > That aside it should be business as usual with existing developers working > on C++1y, Objective-C, OpenCL and OpenMP directing their respective areas > of the parser. > > Cheers > Alp. > > -- > http://www.nuanti.com > the browser experts > > > _______________________________________________ > cfe-commits mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits > >
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
