On Tue Mar 26 2013 at 1:48:29 AM, Alexey Samsonov <[email protected]> wrote:
> Author: samsonov > Date: Tue Mar 26 03:45:29 2013 > New Revision: 177997 > > URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=177997&view=rev > Log: > Actually mark ASan-unfriendly test as XFAIL > > Modified: > cfe/trunk/test/Index/annotate-deep-statements.cpp > > Modified: cfe/trunk/test/Index/annotate-deep-statements.cpp > URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/test/Index/ > annotate-deep-statements.cpp?rev=177997&r1=177996&r2=177997&view=diff > ============================================================ > ================== > --- cfe/trunk/test/Index/annotate-deep-statements.cpp (original) > +++ cfe/trunk/test/Index/annotate-deep-statements.cpp Tue Mar 26 03:45:29 > 2013 > @@ -3,6 +3,9 @@ > // rdar://11979525 > // Check that we don't get stack overflow trying to annotate an extremely > deep AST. > > +// AddressSanitizer increases stack usage. > +// XFAIL: asan > This test is XPASSing for me under ASan. I assume it's because my machine happens to have a higher stack limit. Is there anything we can do to make this more reliable? > + > struct S { > S &operator()(); > }; > > > _______________________________________________ > cfe-commits mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits >
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
